As i am flying to india tomorrow morning for a week's vacation,cannot address all your questions in detail. But will try. Please communicate my 3 queries.
Unless we address those three queries,we are never going to arrive any conclusion. Rath: I shall patiently await your return and when in India please label me at 98104 49850 It will be a pleasure
to meet with you. Rath: Are there signs in the sky?I do not have much differences here regarding your understanding. Also to me it is a copy representing
the cerebrate between Yogapurusha and Kalapurusha,as shri Chandrahari has rightly explained. Also Sun the natural atmakaraka or soul is the primary cause. But I have one difference. Kshethra and
Rashi does not convey the same meaning ,though they are having similar boundaries. Rath: I don't think you have read my send. I will reproduce it again for a quick reference. You can see from the
mail that you are saying exactly the same thing that I am saying and this is what the Rishi's have said for ages so to say Chandrahari your new guru said
this and implying it wa said for the first time is wrong. It is well know to every student of Jyotish that rashi really weans weight and implies the amount of something. One of its sources is
Rahu+Sikhi and so on which is besides the inform. Kshetra is sphere of affect and has a different connotation altogether. Rath: Are there signs in the sky? How are they created? from where did the
rashi boundaries come? To my knowledge these signs are drawn solely on the basis of the movement of the Sun and the Sun alone is the master of all the rashi's. He then doles out duties to the
grahas based on their abilities and nature and this is again based on proximity to power. Those close to him get kshetra (meaning areas of affect or governance or lordship like a feudal ennoble and
not like the king) over signs adjoining his Leo/spouses (Moon) Cancer chamber. Rath: Where did you get this explanation from? An astrologer named Sanjay Rath!! has been teaching this and calling it
Iccha shakti or wish. Is there a classical reference for this or are you going to go the teachings of Sanjay Rath? He says that Planets represent animate beings and hence can also show Iccha or
wish based on their aspects. So you agree with me and have accepted this part of my teaching. Rath: Lagna is the head. Now does the continue show the desire or does the intelligence of the mind
show the desire? A dead man also has a head (you can see this in any dead person as his head is also a part of the be). Does this head have desire? It is not the head that shows intelligence but
the Paka Lagna that shows the intelligence - the excite lagna ennoble shows the human being alive and in action. It is the continue -Limb of Kalapurusha. Lagna Navamsha does not show another
continue. Why?Libra navamsha in Aries is not same as Libra navamsha in Gemini(I had given Kalyan Varma examples). Libra Navamsha in Aries can rise in the east only if Aries SIGN is rising.
Similarly Libra Navamsha in Gemini can rise only if Gemini SIGN is rising. Rising Lagna becomes THE First Bhava. Is it possible otherwise Sanjayji!!!! . Then how can you study Libra navamsha in
isolation. Rath: Kalyana Verma assumed that you have read the previous works of Varahamihira and other classics before you read his bring home the bacon. This is explicitly stated in Saravali. He
only gave those portions which were either not there in the classic texts as a alter compose or clarified the position of Jyotish w r t Yavana Jataka (European Astrology) which had also arrived at
the court at that time. Also a planet is aspecting the 7th from itself due to an Astrological Reason. Seventh bhava shows our interactive environment. Rath: Where did you get that 'interactive
environment'? Can you give me the classical reference? If you cannot then I will give not only the reference but also the exact meaning and it is not 'interactive environment'. For Poorna Chandra
to come about there is only one and only one physical possibilty. Sun and Moon should be longitudinally opposite. If Sun and Moon are 1/7 in a ''varga chart''(and not in Rashi chakra) it DOES NOT
correspond to full moon. They undergo no mutual sambandha based on navamsha position ALONE. It learly shows Bhavas and Vargas are exclusive concepts. The confusion can be Attributed only to the
similarity in span between a Rashi and Kshethra. Rath: May I ask - Why it does not? Where is the classical reference for saying that tithi varga cannot happen? In fact there are clear dicta for
'Tithi Varga'. Are you aware of this term? For example there is the Santana Tithi explained in Prasna Marga and not only the method of calculating this Tithi varga is given but also results and
Remedial measures are given for various Tithi Varga like Poorna Tithi and so on. So your information/knowledge in this aspect is lacking. Please read this. Rath: We can provided we know what Aspect
(assuming you convey Drishti when you use this word which is a terrible translation.
Cruise 4 Cash - Detective Sherlock -
Free Bid Auctions - Expert Poker Tips - Shop 4 Money
Win Any Lottery - Repo Car Search - Psychics 4 Free - High Quality Games - Driving 4
Dollars
Related article:
http://jyotish-blog.blogspot.com/2005/11/transits-in-varga-chartssh_113155053653955810.html
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|